Would it better for Democrats to lose in Nov, in order to reap a bigger win in two years?
Huffington Post received 1.3 million unique visitors last month.
Hurrah for Harry, soon to be daddy of number 3. He’s having the hardest time coming up with a boy name. There are just so many better girl names than boy names. My sympathies, Harry. We had the same problem. I remember liking the name, Simon, but it could only be pronounced with an English accent.
Tim Burke asks a fun question. “I’m trying to think of current, living, vital writers, thinkers, public figures, artists, entrepreneurs, inventors, scientists, etc., who are uncommonly sensitive to the deep zeitgeist of American life, able to communicate easily and powerfully to wide audiences, and particularly able to capture the richness and zest of American society and history in its ambiguity and uncertainties without being polemical. I’m looking for people who have their finger on the pulse of American society. “
Apt. 11d 
Tom Wolfe? David Brooks?
LikeLike
Marjorie Williams is dead, but hasn’t been for long. Caitlin Flanagan can ring lots of chimes.
LikeLike
If Democrats can’t win in November, they’ll never be able to win — ever. Besides, the important thing isn’t being in the White House, better to be in control of the House or Senate.
But for the interest of the country, a divided government is one that actually works. I’ll be happy so long as the Christian Socialists lose control of either the Senate or the House, and don’t regain in ’08.
LikeLike