So, the New York Times is going to make it harder for you free-loaders to read their online articles. Everything is going behind a paywall. You'll get to see 20 articles for free every month, but after that, you'll get hit up for money.
Since I'm a heavy linker to the New York Times, I'm not sure how I should handle this. I could just lift more of their text and put it into the blog, so you won't have to bother with the paywall. Or I could stop linking to the Times articles and find similar sources on free websites. Not sure what I'll do yet.
Is anyone planning on paying for a subscription who didn't pay before?
Is this a smart move for the Times? Will it bring in more revenue? Stanch the movement towards making content completely worthless?
