The best review is a bad review. Example A – Scott McLemee's review of Cornel West's Brother West: Living and Loving Out Loud, A Memoir.
Legend has it that the blues guitarist Robert Johnson acquired his
haunting style by selling his soul to the devil at a crossroads. West,
as a “bluesman of the life of the mind,” has clearly also been to the
crossroads. The devil gave him a team of publicists. I don't think this
was a good bargain on West's part. It left him unable to recognize that
self-respect is often the enemy of self-esteem.
[Snickering sounds.]

My favorite bad review of all time is probably Ian Sansom’s review of John Fowles’ Journals. But I’d love to know other people’s favorites.
LikeLike
I intended to title my review of a David Foster Wallace book of essays, “A Supposedly Good Author I Will Never Read Again.” Unfortunately, I found the title rendered the review superfluous. (Rather like Daniel Davies and “Being Freakonomical With the Truth”.)
This led Teresa Nielsen Hayden to say, “O, that is wonderful, I am slain.”
LikeLike
Thanks for the pointer, BB. The review explains rather a lot about The Magus, except why people insist on liking it. Best line from Sansom, “They tidy up, your mum and dad.”
LikeLike
West’s comments on marriage made me chortle. Aren’t we going to pillory him, the way we did Sandra Tsing Loh?
LikeLike
I think we’d have to take West’s comments more seriously than we take STL’s to pillory him.
LikeLike
I haven’t read it, but I’m guessing that this is going to make STL seem reasonable.
LikeLike